Quantcast
Channel: Calcutta Chromosome
Viewing all 167 articles
Browse latest View live

5. Monchora

$
0
0
Monchora is the story of a charming thief, who enters a household to steal a priceless gem, and then things get complicated with the presence of a young woman in the household with whom he forms a mixed doubles team and wins the Australian Open. Well, no… of course, not! What are you thinking?
Written by Saradindu Banerjee probably in the 1950s, the story has a certain charm unique to those times, when life was simpler and people were innocent. A film out of such a story can be very promising if it made as a period film or modernized suitably. Monchora does neither and falls flat as a rather dull mish-mash.

Thieves with hearts of gold do have an appeal, if presented intelligently but their motivations and – as importantly – modus operandi have to engage the audience. Thieves wearing black, jumping off parapets and picking up prawn cutlets instead of jewellery could work in a French farce but one needs that mood to hold from start to finish.
Apart from not being updated psychologically, the film doesn’t even keep pace in physical terms. So, Rs 3000 is made to seem like a large amount when a wastrel asks for it – a sum unlikely to last more than half an evening in the places he seems to be frequenting with his lady love. Calcutta’s police chief is constantly hobnobbing with a man whose weekly expenses are no more than Rs 7500 and who doesn’t seem to have any known source of income or power.
Another thing about this film – and most Sandeep Ray films – is the juvenile art direction. A supposedly priceless ruby looks like child’s trinket, bigger and redder than a sugary lozenge. In another scene, a very expensive diamond ring looks like something you’d pick off those temporary stalls that come up during the Pujas. Bengali cinema is no longer hamstrung by low budgets and surely, there are enough jewellery brands – or visual effects studios – who can make these look a bit more believable. This is even more jarring because there are much better looking Bengali films nowadays and certainly the days of clunky sets and props are behind us.
The lead players – especially Saswata Chatterjee – bring in their considerable charisma but the script lets them down and they seldom look more than cardboard cutouts. This story and these characters would have done great in the times of Uttam Kumar and Suchitra Sen – backed by some kickass music – but in the present day and age, it just doesn’t cut ice. 

6. Airlift

$
0
0
More than one and a half lakh Indians get stranded in a country which is invaded by dictator. Who – do you think – would take the lead to rescue them?
1. Air India / Indian Airlines
2. Minister of External Affairs
3. Joint Secretary in the Ministry of External Affairs
4. A Punjabi businessman
Facts of the matter be damned, when a Katyal played by no less than a Bhatia saunters into the stage with a Kaur in tow, I don’t think any part of the Indian government machinery really stands a chance. 

After the release of Airlift, many individuals have come forward to claim that the Indian government and its national carrier played a stellar role in the evacuation of the Indians stranded in Kuwait during Iraq’s invasion. But frankly, when they show Air India pilots reluctant to undertake the evacuation mission or a craven minister in a minority government, they hit home so well that you tend not to dig into the facts of the case. 
The film ends with a tribute to two South Indian (most likely, Malayali) gentlemen who was largely responsible for the Indians leaving Kuwait safe and sound via Jordan. The rationale for changing the Malayalis to Punjabi was rather obvious. I could not imagine Akshay Kumar pulling off a Mallu accent or Mohanlal pulling in a capacity crowd outside of Kerala (and maybe, Gelf)! 
[This was somewhat reminiscent of No One Killed Jessica, where the Barkha Dutt character was depicted ‘stinging’ the Shayan Munshi character while it was Tehelka magazine which had done it IRL. Tehelka got a mention for ‘Breakthrough Journalism’ in the end.]

Many have declared Airlift to be the finest performance in Akshay Kumar’s career. While that is debatable (and Special 26 comes to mind as a contender), he does put up a splendid performance as Ranjit Katyal – a wheeling dealing businessman who becomes a messiah almost by accident. The devil-may-care attitude at the beginning, his change of heart when he sees his driver getting shot and his reluctant shepherding of the Indian masses have been most realistically portrayed. Nimrat Kaur, on the other hand, has precious little to do except for one scene (which she does extremely well).
Apart from the performances, what made Airlift really good is the slow transition it depicted in all the characters. The transition of Nimrat Kaur from the exasperated wife to the understated supporter was very well-written (apart from being well-performed). The transformation of a Foreign Ministry official from a foot-dragging minion to crusader for the 'refugees' is done with a lovely balance of realism and emotion. 

One of the most difficult things – I think – in Hindi cinema is to make a rousing film with a patriotic message without degenerating into jingoism. And this, Airlift does exceedingly well. The diversity of India is brought out beautifully, without going over the top. The motivations of the people, their unconscious selfishness, their self-conscious beliefs are all seamlessly woven into the script.

And the high point of the film – for me – was done superbly despite being expected. At Jordan’s Amman airport, the fleeing Indians are met with typical bureaucratic apathy and absolutely no signpost for them to reach out to. All the nations had put up flags to guide their citizens, except for India. And just then, the Air India official receives a call from New Delhi and wheels start turning. As Akshay Kumar – who often claimed to be Kuwaiti early in the film – looks up, we see a nondescript airport official hoisting the Indian flag and with its unfurling, we get the climax we came for. Many of us stand during national anthems, many of us don’t, some of us are made to… but the honest truth is that when you see the three colours forming a perfect arc as someone straightens the flagpole and fixes it to the ground, you have to really hate your country to not have a lump in your throat. 
And Airlift is a good place to test that out.



As a footnote, I would like to add a Facebook post from a friend. Her father, then working for Air India, was part of the team stationed in Amman for nearly three months to evacuate the Indians. Going off to a war zone for three months at three days' notice... wonder if there is a film in that story?

Aparajito

$
0
0
Let me start with the extras on this Criterion DVD.  
The first segment is an interview of film critic, Ujjal Chakraborty, who explains the symbolism in the film through its various scenes and motifs. He draws from Ray’s storyboards, his cover designs and illustrations to explain Ray’s visual style though some of the examples of symbolism seemed a little stretched.
That is followed by a conversation with Satyajit Ray recorded in August 1958, when he visited USA. The interview is about his early filmmaking career, followed by a fairly detailed description of the making of Aparajito. Ray talks about composing his visuals and adding on music in great detail, confessing that “I like a bit of a rough edge to my films”.
After that, there is a video-essay with narration by Andrew Robinson, Ray’s biographer. If you are a Ray aficionado, you’d probably have read much of this (in Robinson’s biography itself) but there is still a lot of charm to hear it in Robinson’s voice.
The final piece is an absolute gem – a half-hour documentary made for Canadian television in 1967. Part of a series called ‘A Creative Person’, the short film shows him talking extensively about his though process during the filmmaking process and also shows him shooting with Uttam Kumar (on Chiriakhana), with him actually operating the camera and instructing actors. There are some extremely valuable scenes showing Ray location hunting and composing for (for Gupi Gayin Bagha Bayin) and explaining his choices. He is also doing something that later became a trademark – collecting props from a classmate’s palatial house for use in his films. The documentary also has his chief technicians – Subrata Mitra and Bansi Chandragupta – talk about their experiences of working with him.  His actors are interviewed including Madhabi who speaks in Bengali, with Soumitra translating it to English (both of them on sets and in costume for some period drama). The film gives an idea of Ray’s celebrity status (even when he was just a decade into making films) when he is mobbed by a huge crowd as he comes out of a location.
Ray’s very articulate self is intercut with scenes from Calcutta of that times (including some shots of browsing books on College Street). About Calcutta, he says, “[it is a] rich and dense and complex city… intellectually alert… people are constantly reacting to things… and as a filmmaker, that’s what interests me…” 
The extras are a sumptuous, juicy dessert after the feast of a film.

The restored version of Aparajito brings alive the dazzling power of the Kashi Vishwanath temple aarti, the aging elegance of Varanasi, the crumbling walls of the city, the intricate carvings inside mandirs and the dramatic light and shadow of the night scenes.  
And yet, the enhanced visual delight is just a support to the wonderful screenplay – of what is essentially a rambling story – that brings a certain pace to the proceedings. In his usual unobtrusive way, Ray paints some cruel pictures that are distressingly real. The casual ease with which a young boy leaves his sick father to burst Diwali crackers or gets over his father’s death is something picked up from real life and yet, something commercial cinema has never been able to depict.
Even the small characters like the lecherous Nanda Babu and the idealistic school Headmaster are so well-written and lovingly detailed that there is never a boring moment. (And yes, the caricature of the headmaster on the school wall was done by Ray himself.)
  
Karuna Banerjee’s performance as Sarbajaya is surely one of the finest acting performances in Indian cinema. Apart from her speech and facial expressions, even her body language evolves in the film as she goes from being a sheltered wife to a strong single bread earner to a neglected mother. The dark circles under her eyes, the roughness of her hair, the frailness of her gait, the gradual wilting of her voice all add up to a towering performance.
While Hindi cinema is about the bombastically sacrificial mother, Sarbajaya exemplifies the ‘strong silent type’ who sacrifices a lot because she is determined not to let her son become a rich household’s minion. Her limited world view makes her want her son to become a priest in the family traditions but when the son’s strong ambitions are made clear, she is the one who finds the funds to make it possible. When the young Apu says “Maa, ami schooley jabo” (Maa, I want to go to school) and asks her for money, her helplessness gives way to a resolve, one that only mothers are capable of.
She is obviously not keen on her son going away and her argument with Apu about his future in Calcutta is a distressing one because it is the sort of argument that parents always lose, or maybe they want to lose. Again, her grief gives way to resolve and the scene in which Sarbajaya packs Apu’s suitcase is so well-written and well-performed that you don’t realise that both the writer and actor are just two films old.

When Apu comes back home from Calcutta, Sarbajaya recounts her fears of disease and death to him while – oblivious to all that – a tired Apu drifts off to sleep. One is reminded of a similar scene in Pather Panchali when Sarbajaya rambled to Harihar and her husband too drifted off to sleep. From son to husband (and maybe her father before that), Sarbajaya is the Indian Everywoman.
In the final scenes, when she resignedly says “Shey jodi ashey to nijei ashbey” (He will come on his own if he has to), it just brings a heartbreaking curtain down on her life of struggles.




To bring this to an end, I will link a letter Mrinal Sen’s son wrote to his mother about the impact Aparajito had on a group of Indian students in the US in mid-1980s. I think it brings alive at least a part of what I felt during this viewing of Aparajito.
The last time I watched Aparajito, I was on Apu’s side. This time, I had shifted over to Sarbajaya’s. I think this is what distinguishes a master’s works from those by lesser mortals. The work has a new relevance and a new meaning every time you watch it.

[Frivolous Footnote: In one scene, Apu gleefully tells his friend that he has ‘managed’ to wriggle out of going home for the vacations by sending a money order to his mother. His belief that his mother would be satisfied with the money reminded me of Deewaar, where another son tried to buy his mother’s support for his wrongdoings.]

7. Gulaab Gang

$
0
0
When Gulaab Gang had released, I had two reasons to watch it. One, Madhuri Dixit was returning to the big screen after a long hiatus (and that too, in a completely different sort of role). Two, the director of the film (who is the writer and composer as well) is a ‘social media friend’. But as luck would have it, I was caught up in a terribly busy period at work when the film released and could not catch it in the theatres.
Nearly two years after the film released, I finally managed to catch it a couple of days back on TV. Watching a film is never as good as watching it in the theatres – thanks to all the breaks – but I recorded it and watched it in one go.

I liked the film a lot, principally because it was a throwback to that old style of Hindi cinema where the good and evil clash in a series of epic battles before evil is vanquished in a volcano of blood and gore. We have seen Amitabh or Dharmendra play the oppressed villager so many times to Amrish Puri or Sadashiv Amrapurkar’s evil politician and yet, a well-made repeat of those plots still manages to engage.
Gulaab Gang, of course, has that brilliant twist in the cast by having Madhuri Dixit and Juhi Chawla in the traditionally male roles. And that works superbly for most part of the film.  

What happens really well in the film is the flow of whistle-inducing dialogues. Both the actresses – though Madhuri a bit more, for obvious reasons – have the most kickass lines. The "Danda sabka peer hai" (Rod is God!) line was promoted a lot in the trailers and that is just one of the many great lines in the film. I particularly liked Madhuri Dixit’s “Uparwali jab deti hai toh chhappad phaadke deti hai… neechewali jab leti hai toh patloon phaadke leti hai” line. Good enough for me to have remembered it from two days back J 
Apart from the dialogues, the action set-pieces of the film are really well done – more so, because women were doing all the action scenes. So Madhuri Dixit and her gang deliver some butt-clenchingly good action. The power with which the sickles dug into the flesh gave me the cringes many times in the film!
Madhuri’s entrance scene and its buildup is one of the best that I can remember in recent time, heroes included – really setting her up for a great role. Even the scene in which Juhi Chawla leaves the building to greet a waiting crowd only to be upstaged by a regal Madhuri Dixit behind her is masterfully done.


What didn’t work me was the placement of songs. They really hampered the flow of the story and I was impatiently waiting for the film to get on whenever the songs happened. 
At the time of the release, I was a bit disappointed to see the not-so-positive reviews of the film though many of them praised Juhi Chawla’s performance as the one to watch out for. I was rather underwhelmed by her performance as – to me – she did not manage to break completely free of her super-sweet image and become the evil politician on screen. She had some great lines but she just didn’t convey the menace the character was supposed to.  

But nevertheless, Gulaab Gang was a really entertaining watch because it got the essence of old-school Bollywood really well. The dhamaka dialogues, the kaante ka takkar, the swishing sickles, the larger-than-life leads, the eye-candy heroines… oh wait!

[Frivolous Footnote: Wondering how Sridevi would have been in Juhi Chawla’s role. She does over-the-top acts really well. She has a natural sneer. (Or is it a snarl?) And her rivalry with Madhuri has a jagged edge that Juhi’s rivalry probably never had. Hmmm...]

8. Asterix: Mansion of the Gods

$
0
0
Many years back, my father announced that he wanted to watch the Bengali film to be shown on Doordarshan that Saturday because his (then) boss had a small role in it. He was never an avid movie watcher and I was intrigued enough to join him. (At that age, I preferred to avoid Bengali cinema and preferred the Sunday Hindi movie because that had 'fighting'.)
The film was Aranyer Dinratri and I was gobsmacked to find that the director was a gentleman I was very familiar with. He wrote the Feluda novels... and now it turned out that he had directed a few films in his spare time!
This serendipitous discovery started with me memorising the thirteen names in the Memory Game that evening and ended up being the most rewarding part of my movie-watching life.

A few days back, we went to see an animated film on Asterix and somewhere in between the film, my son realised that there was a stack of books on the top shelf of my bookcase have these strange characters with winged helmets and striped swimsuit-like clothes. "You mean, there is a book on this movie? Like Harry Potter?"
So after watching the film, my son has started reading Asterix comics. And now we have to contend with "Ahahahaha, the ironsmith is called Fulliautomatix... Fully. Automatic. Geddit?" every now and then.
If wasting one Sunday afternoon siesta of mine can end with a lifelong addiction to the crazy Gauls for him, I'd call it a fair trade.

Why did I recount the first story? Just.
Why did I recount these two random things in a 'review' of a film? Just.

9. Sulemani Keeda

$
0
0
Sulemaani Keedawas one of those low-profile films that all your friends love and egg you to watch but the multiplexes conspire to run the shows at odd timings and you miss out. I had forgotten all about it till I read an interview of the director (Amit Masurkar) in HT Brunch about his second film and ended up (legally) streaming Keeda.


Well, the film turned out to be exactly as I expected – made on a shoestring budget, on real locations, with identifiable characters on the fringes of the film industry. And yes, it was laugh out loud funny. It has walk-on parts by Mahesh Bhatt (who overacts as usual) and Amit ‘Gadar’ Sharma (who actually provides a real lead to the film parts), packing the script with nods towards the film industry, especially its writers.
The lead pair – the painfully shy Dulal and the painfully exuberant Mainak – form a quirky duo out to write a ‘badi film kissi bade Khan ke saath’. In their pursuit, they meet some real people picked up from suburban Bombay (or is it Mumbai?) and some not-so-real people (or are they?) picked up from Bollywood. You have a cat named Fellini and a star-son called Gonzo who wants to show ‘angry lustless dark orgies’ in films that are completely ‘out of the box’ (the new-age shorthand for ‘hatke’).
In between open mics for budding poets and shopping expeditions in Colaba, we get glimpses of scriptwriting sessions in farmhouses where fly-swatting neighbours turn out to be more important than they look.
The performances are uniformly real, of which Aditi Vasudev (who was earlier seen as Rishi Kapoor’s daughter in Do Dooni Char) really stood out. Razzak Khan – in a short scene as Bollywood producer Sweety Kapoor – brings in his customary flourish with a neat hanky trick.

Sulemaani Keeda captures beautifully the dilemma of the new-age writers in old-school Bollywood where Last Tango in Paris’ ‘masala scenes’ are used to pacify irate landlords and Dekalog is in conflict with Dabangg
Essentially, it is about writers and their ordinary lives in pursuit of extraordinary stories. The writers’ blocks, the snobbery of ‘film writers’ towards ‘TV writers’, their humble brags and their desperations are brought out really well. 
Quite naturally, there are some subtle tributes to writers. For example, the “life is a handkerchief” scene was done by Salim Khan in an interview and the exhortation to “think like the buyer, not the creator” was said by Javed Akhtar in a speech to budding writers. [Yeah, I love writers. Especially, these two.]  

And finally – having written a book on those two writers – I have to quote that one scene which made the film for me.
Mainak stops his scooter in front a building in Bandra.
Dulal: Arre bhai, yahan kyun rok diya?
Mainak (points to passerby): Isse poochho kyun rok diya.
Passerby: Yeh Sallu bhai ka ghar hai, iss liye roka.
Dulal: Arre, Salman Khan ke ghar kya karna hain?
Mainak: Yahan Salim Khan ji hi rehte hain… Samjhe? Kya samjhe?
Dulal: Yehi ke actor ka baap writer hota hai. 


[Frivolous Footnote: Sulemaani Keeda was made for Rs 8.5 lakhs in 2014. Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar were paid a little less than that for Kaala Patthar, a deal they struck in 1976. I don’t know if this is a comment on the low budget of SK or the high fees of SJ but thought of just putting it in.

10. Mission Impossible IV: Ghost Protocol

$
0
0
How does Lea Seydoux - with a background in French art cinema - get cast in action franchises like Bond or MI? She doesn't have an ounce of the icy charm or the kickass action capability that are table stakes for roles like these?

How does Anil Kapoor talk about his Hollywood creds when his entire screen time in MI:IV is a little less than what Priyanka Chopra gets in the opening credits of Quantico?

How does... oh, forget it!

Mission Impossible IV follows the set pattern of the MI films: crazy ass opening sequence, outlining of crazier ass mission, failure of mission despite megatons of gizmo-giri, planning of craziest ass mission to undo damage and - finally - execution of that mission. MI:IV does just that going from Kremlin to Burj Khalifa to Mumbai to an multi-storied automated parking lot (ostensibly in Mumbai as well).
The action scenes are pretty good though the dialogues have to be the clunkiest and corniest I have heard in any Hollywood movie, let alone the MI frachise. And tragically, most of these lines are given to Anil Kapoor.
As billionaire playboy Brij Nath, Anil Kapoor has lines like “I found your capricious passion intriguing” and “Like all Indian men, I’m very hot” before being bested by Paula Patton. I am just filing it under #CannotAbleTo and henceforth, vowing to follow the international careers of only Irrfan and Priyanka C from now on.

Also, it is amazing that these franchises - which seem super-researched at the international locations - turn out to be messes of inaccuracies whenever they land up in India. I am guessing it is because they are terribly researched everywhere but I am able to spot the Indian goofs.
So, you have millionaire Brij introducing Mughal-style miniatures as "original art from Chhatarpur district" while a "state-run TV channel" is the Chennai office of Sun TV and shown to be "6.7 miles from a Mumbai mansion not far away from Taj Palace". And I am not even getting into the Kannada signs in what is supposed to be a Mumbai mall.
We loved you so much, Ethan. And you made our jhakaas Bollywood hero do namaste like as if he is sneezing?
Sigh. 

11. Neerja

$
0
0
It is indeed quite a task to make a film based on real-life incidents since everyone knows what had happened and there is hardly any scope for surprise. Despite that, a well-constructed dramatic retelling of a real event does pack a punch and can be a rich source of interesting films - especially when stuck in the rut of flipping cars and rotating pelvises.

Some random thoughts about Neerja:

The hijackers - owing allegiance to Palestine - were not sentenced to death in trial in Pakistan. All four of them had survived the hijack and despite having killed some twenty passengers (which included Americans), they were sentenced to life imprisonment. Quite amazingly, some of them escaped during a jailbreak in 2008. Yes, four of them are somewhere out there and may have even watched the film.

I was a little puzzled about why Pakistan banned the film. The Pakistan authorities - airport security, Army commandos etc - have been shown in neutral to positive light. It was they who negotiated with the hijackers (stretching it to long hours) and eventually stormed the plane, managing to rescue a fairly large proportion of the passengers.

Thanks to the film, Neerja Bhanot - quite a popular model of her times - is all over the internet once again. She had done ads for quite a few top brands and it is a trip down nostalgia lane to see them once again. A handy compilation is available here.
Interesting to note that she - despite being in her early twenties - routinely played housewives and in one case, the mother of a (what seemed like) ten-year old boy. And ironically, the ad features the boy hoping to be a pilot.

Apart from her ads, a friend reminded me of a story in The Telegraph's Sunday magazine where Neerja's family had revealed that they had managed to establish contact with her 'spirit'. Neerja communicated by writing her messages through her mother holding a pen and scrawling on sheets of paper. I now remember this creating quite a stir because Neerja's messages apparently contained details of the hijack that could have only been known to her while the sceptics questioned her mother's ability to withstand grief of such magnitude.

As @GabbbarSingh said on Twitter, "Neerja is Sonam Kapoor's Guru" alluding to Abhishek Bachchan's landmark film that rose above his usual mediocre performance at the box office and review columns. But Sonam's performance - while very good - certainly doesn't engulf you like Abhishek's did. She is good, aided by having to play an extraordinary character, but I don't see her getting too many awards for it.

Rajesh Khanna has an unseen yet pervasive presence throughout the film as he is supposed to be Neerja Bhanot's favourite film star and she uses his iconic lines at every possible opportunity. I wondered if a girl in her early twenties in the 1980s would be such a huge fan of Kaka, clearly past his prime then. Logically, no but then Hindi cinema fandom hardly operates on logic.

Shabana Azmi - as Neerja's mother, Rama Bhanot - is magnificent. She is in the background for most part of the film but her fine acting qualities are on display everywhere. She is the worried Punjabi mother, seemingly confident and yet scared of her daughter. Her speech in the final scenes is amazing, delivering a message of women's empowerment in very real words. And it drives you to tears.
(Yogendra Tikku as Neerja's father is good too and he seems to have made his own the niche character of a strong daughter's father. He was very good in Queen as well.)

Overall, a fine mix of edge-of-the-seat thrills and good old-fashioned desi emotions. 

12. Titli

$
0
0
Kanu Behl’s Titli is a relentlessly dark, gut-wrenching view of the NCR underbelly where security guards cannot secure us, the police don’t want to secure us and we ourselves are not beyond making someone else insecure for something extra. The malls, the real estate deals, the swanky cars, the plush colonies and various slippery characters populate the landscape of Titli and all of them are distressingly real.
Behl was Dibakar Banerjee’s assistant on two quintessentially NCR films – Oye Lucky! Lucky Oye and Love, Sex Aur Dhokha– and his sharp perception of modern life in the metropolis is evident throughout. In recent times, several films – NH10 and Aurangzeb immediately come to mind – have gone beyond the romance of Dilli and ventured into the places where malls and democracy both end. Dibakar Banerjee’s two early films – Khosla Ka Ghosla and OLLO– were satirical and therefore, had a lightness of touch. His next – LSD– was quite brutal in its indictment of the mindset of the nation’s capital. 
Titli is also a similar film in that respect. It is not a Delhi film, it is an NCR film. From the unfinished constructions that give hope of a better tomorrow to the crippling financial investment that is required to secure that tomorrow, Titli has it all.

The story of a family of three car-jacking brothers and the efforts of the youngest (Titli, played by Shashank Arora) to escape a life of crime is an exact antithesis of the wholesome family values Bollywood is famous for portraying, institutionalized by the producers, Yash Raj Films. The film’s tagline is “Har family family nahin hoti” and the film manages to pack in pretty much every dysfunctional trait one can think of.
Which brings me to – what I felt – was an issue with the film. As someone (was it @bethlovesbolly?) pointed out on Twitter that after a point, it seemed that one had to guess which unforeseen but completely realistic calamity would befall the family next. Like really, how many skulls must be hammered in before we can seek salvation? In a way, Titli is an anti-KJo film – a minefield of dystopian <can’t think of an alliterative synonym for ‘blasts’>.
Nevertheless, it is a strong debut for Kanu Behl and makes one look forward to his next. Incidentally, it is titled Agra and about a call-centre agent in love with a girl while no one is convinced she really exists. Yeah, expect more from the Republic of Dystopia!

[Frivolous Footnote: The role of the father in Titli was played by Lalit Behl, director Kanu’s father – an interesting case of which the only precedent I could think of was Raj directing Prithviraj Kapoor (Awara) and Randhir directing Raj (Kal Aaj Aur Kal). Anyone else?]  

13. Drishyam

$
0
0
Having missed the Hindi version of Drishyam last year, I was strongly directed by a Mallu friend to watch the original starring Lal-ettan. 'Acting masterclass', 'Devgn hammed' and similar phrases were thrown around in the discussion. Thus impressed, I procured a DVD of Malayalam original and prepared to get impressed.
To put it in short, I was mighty impressed.

Mohanlal brings just the right mix of a confidence and diffidence that a successful common man has in India. That the character (and the actor) is razor sharp gets nicely camouflaged by his geniality. which is a critical requirement of the role. Not only acting and facial expressions, even Mohanlal's body language is absolutely perfect.
The supporting cast - mainly consisting of Meera Durairaj, Asha Sarath and Siddiqui - is great too. I can't claim to be an expert on Kerala but the tea shop owner, the sub-contractor, the cable TV operator, the small-time political activist... all of them seemed very familiar!

However, what really stands out is the writing of the film (by the director himself - Jeethu Joseph).
In a mystery thriller with multiple witnesses of varying ages and backgrounds, set in a very real milieu, the structure and the words both become very important. As witnesses are questioned repeatedly, it is critical that the integrity of the interrogation is maintained and at the same time, the entertainment value is not compromised. As in, similar scenes don't become boring.
Again, since the 'hero' is a regular character, his introduction as a regular but heroic character also needs to be real but not boring. The initial part of the film - before the 'crime' takes place - plays out really well as George Kutty's (Mohanlal) equations with his family, his fellow villagers and the police are established smoothly and interestingly.
Finally, the words. They must convey differences in levels of education, affluence, power, confidence and so on. With the characters balanced on a razor's edge trying to prove (or disprove) the commission of a crime, each of these facets become like a see-saw between the police investigators and the people accused of the crime.

In short, watch it. Preferably, the Malayalam version.

[Frivolous Footnote: Uttam Kumar, in the later part of his career, was doing some excellent non-heroic leading roles before he passed away. I always felt that while Uttam Kumar did not have the high-culture sophistication of, say, Soumitra Chatterjee, he did have an innate intelligence that helped him weave a spell around audiences. That is pretty much the quality the protagonist has in Drishyam and I think Uttam Kumar would have played it brilliantly.]

14. Aligarh

$
0
0
Suppose - in a middle class colony in any of our major cities - a single middle-aged man is found to be sleeping with his domestic help. 
Every other detail about the situation just ceases to matter in a situation like this. Maybe it was consensual? Maybe they were in love? How did people find out about it? Did they invade his privacy? None of this matters. Personal choices and preferences take a backseat to the societal norms formed over years of sediment emerging out of ancient scriptures of all religions. 

Aligarh takes this basic issue of privacy and sets it in the landscape of gay rights in India (or the lack it). By tracking the story of a Aligarh University professor who was persecuted for sleeping with a rickshaw-puller, he uses gay rights to raise questions about privacy. When a man is killed in India (a place less than 100 kms from Aligarh), we never ask who killed him. Instead, we ask what meat he had in his fridge. Likewise, we don't ask how a camera-toting thug entered a law-abiding professor's private residence without permission. We ask who was in bed with the professor. 

The story of Aligarh is simple but the screenplay asks several questions, leaving us to work them out. Beyond the social commentary, it is also like a thriller where we are never sure of which testimony is dependable and who colluded with whom. By leaving certain strands of the story hanging and moving on to other strands, it creates a deep sense of unease that is possibly reflective of the way we choose to outrage about some victim today and then conveniently move on to another one tomorrow - without bringing any closure to any of those. 

Manoj Bajpayee does a stellar job of playing the disgraced professor - helpless and strong in turns, heartbreakingly real for the entire film. His Marathi-accented Hindi, his halting poetry recitation, his guilty drinking, his anger, his laughter... are just perfect. 
Equally strong is the second lead - Rajkummar Rao - who brings alive the young, idealistic, Malayali journalist out to give the professor a fair hearing. 
In fact, the entire cast does a great job of looking and playing the parts to perfection. 


When I last heard, an alumnus of Aligarh University (or was it a resident of the city of Aligarh?) had petitioned to have the name of the film changed because being associated with a 'gay film' would have a negative impact on the city and its residents. 
Bombay did not run in Bombay without cuts mandated by its most powerful resident. Aligarh, thankfully, did not meet the same fate. 

15. Race

$
0
0
No Abbas Mustan. No Bipasha, Saif, Anil Kapoor or Ameesha. Bollywood junkies, please excuse.

James Cleveland Owens had to sit in designated bus seats, live in segregated parts of town and endure taunts of his fellow countrymen. His success on the track meant nothing to many of them. He was a pariah. Till he became the symbol of anti-racism that his deeply racist country projected on to the world stage.
Race does a great job of presenting the dilemma of a black man in 1930s America. Should he protest against his country's racism and boycott the biggest stage his sport can get? Or should he participate and make a bigger statement?
No prizes for guessing what he chose but his dilemma came out exceedingly well. That and his obsessive desire to run!

I had read somewhere (was it an article by Sandipan Deb?) that many of our cricketing heroes survived almost by accident. Harbhajan Singh could have got slaughtered in 1984 and Irfan Pathan could have caught the wrong end of a sword in 2002. But they didn't and came together to form an invincible* team that is secular, patriotic and our biggest mood-lifter.
While I was watching Race, I felt this story was also somewhat similar and America should be grateful for the accident that - despite everything - Jesse Owens decided to run and not run away.

16. Bangalore Days

$
0
0
One of the best decisions I have taken in this #100MoviePact is to seek out the best works of regional cinema. Friends have generously recommended old classics ("This is what made Rajini Rajini!") as well as contemporary hits ("The more I see Dulquer, I more I love him!") and all of them are now on my Amazon wishlist.
This one was recommended by Sohini Mitter.

Rock On! meets Dil Chahta Hai meets Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar meets Karnataka Tourism in this delightful film about three cousins who had resolved to live it up in Bangalore as kids and then landed up in the big city by a series of coincidences. The lives society ordains for those who follow rules - and those who don't - are intricately woven.

A girl aspiring for a MBA degree gets married off to an eligible bachelor.
A village boy in love with even the water of the pond gets a job with a software firm.
A rebellious misfit finds a place where his skills can come to use.
But the film doesn't pass any judgement. The girl actually wants to get married to the handsome man she meets. The boy enjoys the money the job offers and the fun that happens in a big city. Nobody seems to be missing what they say they are missing. The characters are refreshingly real as are the settings.
Vivacious RJs. Modern apartments. Tattooed bikers. Burger joints. Friendly neighbourhood uncles. Software parks. Geeks. Freaks. Pricks. Chicks. Scowls. Jowls. All cohabit the world of the three characters and their extended relationships.

One thing I really enjoyed in Bangalore Days is the way filmi cliches are taken and given a very real and contemporary twist. That way, you may know what is about to happen but can never guess how. This exploration of the popular idiom is particularly great where the software engineer cousin describes his idea of a perfect girl found through arranged marriage. The traditional name, the traditional attire, the traditional behaviour of serving tea and snacks... all come true, but in a way you're not likely to expect. Or do they come true?
The climactic bike race. The reconciliation of the couple. The dream girl. The missing father. The disapproving parent. The elopement. The standard tropes suddenly become refreshing and new.

Bangalore Days is quite long - nearly three hours - and there is a short period in the last third when it drags but that it hardly a blip in an otherwise fine film. Writer-director Anjali Menon is clearly a talent to watch out for and so are the actors.
Nithya Menon - known to many of us as the Titan girl - has a short role as well. Wish she had a longer one.  

17. Kapoor & Sons

$
0
0
SPOILER ALERT: This 'review' of the film hints at certain critical revelations that happen in the film. While the film is not a whodunit, it maybe a better idea to not read this before watching. In any case, I sincerely recommend you watch the film before doing anything - let alone reading this!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"It's all about loving your parents." - Tagline of Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham

"A story about two guys... a girl... and one little lie. Believe it!" - Tagline of Dostana 

What Shakun Batra does in Kapoor & Sons is to take these two films from Karan Johar's stable and make such an amazingly heady cocktail out of it that one is never sure if he is consciously slying against his producer or not. He takes the Karan Johar staples - good looking actors, large families, estranged family members, crazy patriarchs, great music, picture-perfect locales, big parties - and does the filmi equivalent of fusion food. It is the KJo ingredients in the hands of an inventive - even subversive - chef.

First up, let's get Rishi Kapoor - hailing from the original Kapoor & Sons enterprise of Bollywood - and his amazing makeup out of the way. Even without the makeup, he exudes a crazy grandfatherliness from every pore and by making his character a tharki, the film just added a whole lot of fun. And by adding Ram Teri Ganga Maili to the jamboree, the self-referencing just made all trivia lovers dreams come true!

Second, let's not get into the acting. Every single actor has acted brilliantly, especially since none of them are playing easy, sweet, happy roles. These are difficult, everyday people who get angry, get into scuffles, have jealousies and insecurities and do cruel things - often not knowing what they are doing.
Siddharth Malhotra and Alia Bhatt leave their student days far behind and play a normal couple, who are not sure if they should be a couple. Ratna Pathak Shah and Rajat Kapoor bring alive the forever bickering couple, who have forgotten why they were in love once and after a lifetime of scars, they are now even wary of good times.
All female viewers have gushed about Fawad Khan's hotness and - indeed - the perfectly featured actor is likely to go far in Bollywood, thanks to his good looks and easy charm. The posters, trailers and all promotional material have exploited this quite mercilessly. I found it quite amazing that he played a role that would make him the darling of many men as well.
Even the bit parts - photographer Wasim, his bodybuilder brother Boobli, Choksey Uncle, including the plumber - are superbly performed.

However, the hero of the film is the writing.
It is certainly not an easy task to take so many actors (some stars, some merely actors), put them in situations that we see happening all around us and still make it interesting. Especially since, the final payoff - the patriarch's dream of a family photo - is not stuff 140-minute blockbusters are usually about. And yet, director Shakun Batra and Ayesha Devitre Dhillon manage to weave a mesmerising screenplay around this dysfunctional family, going about plugging leaks and planning surprise birthday parties.
A word about Ayesha Devitre: She is a hairstylist with some massive blockbusters to her credit. She calls herself a 'hairstylist by profession, scriptwriter by passion' and has only written two films (both co-written with Shakun Batra). Her first film - Ekk Main Aur Ekk Tu - had the confidence of moving away from standard Hindi film tropes, even while seeming to be within a formula. More power and more films to her!

[Frivolous Footnote 1: In a film that has such great writing, it is great that the two heroes are writers of different kinds. For trivia buffs, Fawad Khan's book is called Freedom Fall and Siddharth Malhotra's manuscript is called We Are All Under A Cloud. Thanks Aarti Krishnakumar for that!]

[Frivolous Footnote 2: The film is set in Coonoor, where a cheese maker lives. I was wondering that his best film is also about two brothers - the elder being the favourite and the younger a bit of a dark horse - coming good in their own ways.]

18. Har Har Byomkesh

$
0
0
Some time back, I read a piece about a gentleman who is the executor of Saradindu Bandopadhyay’s (creator of Byomkesh Bakshi) estate and is the single-point of contact for anyone wanting to buy rights – cinema, TV, translation – for the author’s works. He explained in great detail how Byomkesh is probably the most popular series in Bengali, with scores of filmmakers wanting to procure rights. He, in turn, had to balance monetary considerations with long term prospects in order to decide whom to give rights to. This was around the time Detective Byomkesh Bakshy had released and just prior to that, Yash Raj Films had bought the Hindi rights for all the Byomkesh stories.
After Satyajit Ray first brought Byomkesh to screen, there was a fair bit of diffidence in attempting another one – probably because the director and the star who played the Satyanweshi (Uttam Kumar) were both legendary. This jinx was broken when Rajit Kapoor played Byomkesh in the now-legendary TV series directed by Basu Chatterjee.
In the last ten years or so, there has been a slew of Byomkesh films in Bengali. Many directors – including Rituparno Ghosh – have tried their hands with varying degrees of (commercial) success. The present generation of Bengalis don’t have that sense of awe about Uttam Kumar as the previous generations did, leading to a fair bit of acceptance of the screen Byomkeshes. Abir Chatterjee – with his intelligent eyes and sharp features – looks a lot like the sleuth of our imagination and seems to be here to stay. (Incidentally, he also plays Feluda thus proving that his kind of looks is eminently suitable for iconic detectives.)

Anyway, the point of this whole random Byomkeshing is – in my humble opinion – the rather pointlessness of these Byomkesh remakes. Having come out of books that have been read hundreds of times by fans, they don’t stand a chance in matching up to our imagination. 
I just watched Har Har Byomkesh(based on the story Bahni Patanga) and it was a film without complaints and without any memorability whatsoever. One of the key characters is a woman for whom ‘dazzling beauty’ is an understatement. The actress cast is just another beauty, who doesn’t seem like the type who would drive people around her crazy with her looks. Even Satyabati and Ajit are competent actors, meet their brief and yet, they are nothing what I (and millions others) had imagined. While the film recreates the period of the story well, it nevertheless gives a feeling of déjà vu that then gives way to boredom. We have seen this character so many times and similar settings… where is the punch? Where is the suspense (since we know the ending anyway)? If the idea is too hook youngsters who haven’t read Byomkesh, they are unlikely to get attracted by a slow-moving period drama with somewhat amateurish action and barely-passes-master art direction.

This is why I am more impressed by a film like Detective Byomkesh Bakshy… a film that throws the languid pace and leisurely mood-building of the original stories to the winds and presents the intellectual ‘seeker of truth’ as an action hero. It also eschews the regular stories, takes the major characters and creates a pastiche that keeps everyone guessing. Dibakar Banerjee’s Byomkesh had the purists fuming but at least, I thought it presented Byomkesh in a never-before avatar and a lavish scale that would bring many new fans to the fold.
Sure, Saradindu never wanted his Byomkesh to be a ‘detective’ (and that offending word is enshrined in the film’s title) but then again, Saradindu never imagined his Byomkesh to be wearing glasses either. (Ever since Uttam Kumar wore a pair in Ray’s film, most actors seems to donning one to play Byomkesh.)

Anyway, to bring this to a closure – Har Har Byomkesh is a mild-mannered film, not unlike one of those side characters in Byomkesh stories who look inconsequential right at the beginning and continue to remain inconsequential throughout.


[Frivolous Footnote: The director is obviously a big fan of Ray. Not satisfied with moving the setting of the film to Varanasi, he has inserted an entire (redundant) sequence that is a replica of a similar scene in Joi Baba Felunath. There are cleverer ways of paying tribute, I’d imagine.]

Apur Sansar

$
0
0
I finished the final film of the most brilliant film trilogy to be made or ever will be. Apur Sansar has always been a favourite of mine – especially after I have a Kajal to become friends with, instead of being a father to. This watching just cemented some of those emotions.

Some thoughts that came this time:
Apu, being the younger son of the family (and being doted on), is bit of a spoilt brat! He is the spoilt brat when dealing with his landlord (whose lights he switches on during the day to spite him). But he is the conscientious man when it comes to paying the rent (by selling his books).

The performances of the bit players are amazing.
Apu’s landlord. His surnamesake neighbour. The school principal who advertised for a teacher. The pharma company manager whom Apu asks for a job. Apu’s much-married colleague. Aparna’s parents. All of them just shine like diamonds in the few minutes they are on screen.

Of the lead players, what more can be said?
Soumitra Chatterjee would have done to womenfolk of those times what Fawad Khan is doing now. And when you see, Ray exploits his amazing looks and exemplary elocution skills to the hilt with carefully planned scenes. And he seems to have no qualms in subjecting Soumitra to the female gaze, giving his vests gaping holes and making him exercise in pouring rain!

Sharmila Tagore, who was not even fifteen when she shot for the film, is remarkably assured in her mannerisms and dialogue delivery. In her short screen time, she manages to effortlessly establish why Apu is so much in love with her.
And in a telling scene, the husband also fans the wife after he has finished eating (when the wife was fanning him)… and he does so grudgingly, yawning while fanning and not in the sacrificial style commercial cinema is always showing. In the late 1950s, Ray knew what we are still trying to come to terms with… women’s equality would happen grudgingly, even from the good men!


The transition of emotions seemed even smoother on this viewing.
The way Apu is shown to agree to the marriage – him accepting the archaic concept of a girl becoming unsuitable for marriage if the auspicious hour passes – is very believable and almost natural. He is a modern youth with a scientific bent of mind and yet his natural goodness makes him agree to marry a girl he hasn’t even met. And he does so embarrassedly, without even being able to spell it out. He asks his friend Pulu, “Chakrita pawa jabey toh? Daritao kamano hoeni…” (Will you get me the job you promised? I haven’t even shaved…)
This unplanned marriage leads to the emotion of the helpless father who had to marry off his daughter much below his social standing due to societal pressures. Aparna’s father depicts this frustration heartbreakingly, which translates into a lifetime of resentment against the son-in-law. As a father of a daughter, I thought he ‘got’ it so well.

Much has been said about Apu’s manic grief and whether it suited the normally unemotional character that we saw growing up.
We need to see Apu as a character, who became progressively alone in his life, having lost his beloved family one by one. Finally, he had found a companion – who seemed to be a soulmate – and again lost her. This tragedy is, understandably, devastating for him. In this context, the grief seems almost normal.
The grief of Aparna’s death is built like a tragic movement where the announcement is just the beginning and the subsequent events keep adding to the point of suffocation when Apu sacrifices his novel in a moment of extreme listlessness. This extreme act of abandonment, coupled with the physical transformation of Apu from a handsome young man to an unkempt, haggard tramp, was just too draining a sequence.
The symphonic final closure – with Apu and Kajal reuniting – finally lifts this pall of gloom.

Finally, about the DVD.
The subtitles are very good. They are not literal and manage to capture the essence really well. People who don’t understand Bengali can fearlessly pick up a copy.
Among the supplements, Satyajit Ray’s Oscar acceptance is a much-watched sequence that gets included.
Another segment shows The Restoration process, which is like magic and documents the work done at New York, Bologna, LA where every scratch, every speck dirt and dust on the available negatives were painstakingly removed and the passion of the technicians shines through.
Film critic Mamoun Hassan’s detailed and gushing look at the Trilogy is almost a scene by scene deconstruction of all three films, offering a commentary on the important scenes along with his reactions. This could be a little boring for some viewers but valuable nevertheless.
The stunning piece de resistance are interviews of Soumitra Chatterjee (speaking in Bengali) and Sharmila Tagore (in English). They are still so luminous and animated when talking about their first film roles that it is an absolute delight.


If I haven’t said this already, buy the Criterion DVD set. It is probably the best cinematic investment you’ll ever make. 

19. Fan

$
0
0
In short, Fan did not live up to the pre-release hype (at least for me). Shah Rukh Khan (who had cleverly lowered expectations with Dilwale and Happy New Year) and Maneesh Sharma (who has some nice films to his credit in the recent past) were supposed to work magic among masses and classes. In the end, it turned out to be Darr meets Don meets West Delhi.
Sigh. What a waste.
It is very unfair to judge a film on what you want to see rather than what has been made but I couldn't help wondering a superstar's relationship with an obsessed fan could have been so much better than a jazzy chase film.
Sigh...

Over the last few days, I have been discussing - with friends - various scenes of another superstar film, the original superstar film - Nayak. There are many similarities between Nayak and Fan. Both films have the star involved in a nightclub brawl, being insecure after a lacklustre film at the box office, grappling nosy journalists and eventually, retreating into his cocoon after a brush with reality.
The star's ascendance is nicely brought out in both films. In Nayak, the star himself recounts it through a series of flashbacks (during the course of an interview he unwittingly does). In Fan, the fan follows the exact route his hero took while going from Delhi to Bombay (WT on Rajdhani, Room 205 in Hotel Delite).
Uttam Kumar's casual disdain while handling cynical journalists and charming suaveness while handling fans formed a very interesting balance. On the other hand, SRK is strangely uni-dimensional in handling his fans. For someone who thinks nothing of punching an upstart of a colleague, he seems rather unrealistically law-abiding when it comes to an obsessive fan's unlawful activities.
Both films show how the demi-gods of tinseltown are strangely beholden to different kinds of moneybags. SRK is deferential, almost servile to an Indian billionaire who has hired him to dance at his daughter's wedding. While Uttam Kumar is respectful towards a Marwari producer though he doesn't kowtow to him (despite going through a shaky period in his career).

Despite the many similarities, Nayak and Fan remain light years apart. One is a classic exploration of a star's mind while the other is just a jazzy chase film.
Sigh...

[Frivolous Footnote: Autograph (2010) was another delicious exploration of a star and the people around him, made as a tribute to Nayak. The composer of Autograph - Anupam Roy - has written the lyrics and performed the Bengali version of the Jabra Fan song.]

After writing this, I read two brilliant reviews.
One by Greatbong, on how he was a SRK fan once and may consider becoming one once again.
The other by Beth, on how Fan is actually - well - Nayak exploded.

20. The Jungle Book

$
0
0
What review can I give for the highest grossing film of the year?

First, watch the film in Hindi.
Priyanka Chopra as Kaa. Nana Patekar as Sher Khan. Irrfan as Baloo. Om Puri as Bagheera. How much cooler can it get?

Second, watch the promotional song. Yes, again. And again. And again. And again.

And then watch the English version of the Hindi version.
"Jungle jungle, word is spreading here and there
A flower has bloomed wearing underwear..."
#epic

21. Captain America: Civil War

$
0
0
A group of twelve – each member with a different kind of superpower – divide themselves into two teams of six and have a go at each other till my son’s brain exploded into a million small pieces. Totally the kind of film I look forward to watching. NOT.
The opening sequence – a Bond-like chase – and the runaway sequence in which the 6vs6 fight happens, are the only two places that held my attention though my son was hooked to the whole thing.
Must watch for fans of American superheroes. Must avoid for fans of Indian superheroes.


22. U Turn

$
0
0
A newspaper intern tries to write a story about traffic rule breakers, specifically the ones who remove divider blocks to take an illegal u-turn on the Double Road flyover (in Bangalore). After she goes to interview the latest rule-breaker, his dead body is discovered and she becomes a murder suspect herself. Further investigations reveal that ten people who had taken that risky U-turn in the last few months had all committed suicide on the day they broke the rule. 
Pawan Kumar’s U Turn has this very interesting premise and the first half builds up brilliantly towards an expectation of ominous revelations. However, the second half degenerates partially into a rather unsatisfying resolution of the mystery and partially into a public service message from Bangalore Traffic Police. To me, this was a rather disappointing end to a film I was enjoying tremendously for most part. The scary parts were really scary and the investigation as well as the police procedures were all done well.

The lack of bite in the final resolution is a big letdown considering the obvious professional finesse with which the film is made. All the actors are fit perfectly into their roles and act very well. Lead actress, Shraddha Srinath, is particularly good and does all kinds of scenes – light and dramatic – with confidence. The dialogues are very real and have the typical mix of Kannada and English Bangalore is famous for. I particularly liked the opening scene where the heroine’s mother is trying to get her to see prospective grooms, which is genuinely funny even though the situation is a cliché.

Pawan Kumar’s first film, Lucia, was a big critical success (and incidentally, made by crowdfunding). U Turn shows he clearly has the talent to pull off interesting genres and I will certainly look forward to his other films. If only he tones down the public service messaging.
Viewing all 167 articles
Browse latest View live